论文标题
用树状图鉴定的恒星形成核的高度可变的时间演变
The highly variable time evolution of star-forming cores identified with dendrograms
论文作者
论文摘要
我们研究了使用树状图在分子云模拟中鉴定出的密集核的时间演变,这是识别恒星形成的模拟和观察结果中层次结构的常见工具。我们开发了一种算法,以使用磁流体动力学模拟的三维密度场通过时间连接树状图结构,从而为域中的所有致密核心创造历史。我们发现,核心特性的整个人群分布在时间上相对不变,诸如核心质量功能之类的数量与观测值匹配。尽管有这种一致性,但单个核心可能会经历大型(> 40%),由于时间段之间的树状结构重新定义,随机变化。这种变化与环境和恒星含量无关。我们确定了伪装成密集的岩心的短寿命(<200 kyr)过度,这些岩心可能占任何时间快照的20%。最后,我们注意到解释初始质量功能的起源时考虑核心的完整历史的重要性;我们发现,特别是对于包含多个恒星的系统,快照中的树状图叶定义的核心质量通常小于最终系统恒星质量。这项工作强化了没有时间稳定的密度轮廓来定义恒星形成的核心。树状图本身可能会导致时间步之间的显着结构变化,这是由于密度场的较小变化。因此,在比较具有不同年龄或环境特性区域的树状图时必须谨慎,因为树状图结构的差异可能仅来自密集核的物理演化。
We investigate the time evolution of dense cores identified in molecular cloud simulations using dendrograms, which are a common tool to identify hierarchical structure in simulations and observations of star formation. We develop an algorithm to link dendrogram structures through time using the three-dimensional density field from magnetohydrodynamical simulations, thus creating histories for all dense cores in the domain. We find that the population-wide distributions of core properties are relatively invariant in time, and quantities like the core mass function match with observations. Despite this consistency, an individual core may undergo large (>40%), stochastic variations due to the redefinition of the dendrogram structure between timesteps. This variation occurs independent of environment and stellar content. We identify a population of short-lived (<200 kyr) overdensities masquerading as dense cores that may comprise ~20% of any time snapshot. Finally, we note the importance of considering the full history of cores when interpreting the origin of the initial mass function; we find that, especially for systems containing multiple stars, the core mass defined by a dendrogram leaf in a snapshot is typically less than the final system stellar mass. This work reinforces that there is no time-stable density contour that defines a star-forming core. The dendrogram itself can induce significant structure variation between timesteps due to small changes in the density field. Thus, one must use caution when comparing dendrograms of regions with different ages or environment properties because differences in dendrogram structure may not come solely from the physical evolution of dense cores.