论文标题

基于大学排名的国家排名

Rankings of countries based on rankings of universities

论文作者

Kalhor, Bahram, Mehrparvar, Farzaneh

论文摘要

尽管已经设计了许多用于对大学进行排名的方法,但是没有合适的系统根据其大学的表现来关注国家的排名。一个地区大学的总体排名可以表明该土地人民中科学的利益增长。本文根据大学的排名介绍了一种新颖的排名机制。首先,我们根据其大学的排名介绍并讨论两个国家的两个新排名。其次,我们根据所选方法创建国家的排名,基于Webometrics.info的前12000所大学(2012年1月),并比较四个版本的国家排名(2012年1月至2013年7月)。首先,我们根据其大学排名(WR)和平均排名(AR)介绍了两种新方法的新方法。其次,我们根据两年的数据在排名国家中讨论了引入的排名系统如何在排名国家中执行。第三,我们选择QS(http://www.topuniverisities.com)和webometrics.info作为两个不同的分类系统,以比较国家排名,基于这些排名中的前500所大学。结果表明,该方法可用于显示每个国家的整个大学的质量,用于比较国家的排名与世界其他国家相比。

Although many methods have been designed for ranking universities, there is no suitable system that focuses on the ranking of countries based on the performance of their universities. The overall ranking of the universities in a region can indicate the growth of interests in science among the people of that land. This paper introduces a novel ranking mechanism based on the rankings of universities. Firstly, we introduce and discuss two new rankings of countries, based on the rank of their universities. Secondly, we create rankings of countries according to the selected method, based on the top 12000 universities in webometrics.info (January 2012) and compare rankings of countries in 4 editions (January 2012 to July 2013). Firstly, we introduce two new methods of ranking countries based on their university rankings, Weighted Ranking (WR) and Average Ranking (AR). Secondly, we discuss how the introduced ranking systems, perform in ranking countries based on the two years of data. Thirdly, we choose QS (http://www.topuniversities.com) and webometrics.info as two different classification systems for comparing rankings of countries, based on the top 500 universities in these rankings. Results indicate that the methodology can be used to show the quality of the whole universities of each country used to compare rankings of countries in practice compare to other countries in the world.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源