论文标题

脉冲星无线电发射机制:批评

Pulsar radio emission mechanisms: a critique

论文作者

Melrose, D. B., Rafat, M. Z., Mastrano, A.

论文摘要

我们认为,至关重要的三种最广泛的脉冲星无线电发射机制:相干曲率发射(CCE),光束驱动的相关等离子体发射(RPE)和异常多普勒发射(ADE)。我们假设Pulsar等离子体是一个维(1D),以散装的Lorentz因子$γ_ {\ rm S} \ gg \ gg \langleγ\ rangle -1 \ gtrsim 1 $向外流式传输。我们认为,多云模型中梁的形成在合理参数的本质相对论情况下无效,因为超过的时间太长。我们认为,其余框架中粒子分布的默认选择是j {ü} ttner分布,相对论流应通过将lorentz变换应用于其余框架分布,而不是广泛假定的相对流式流动式高斯分布。我们发现,波束驱动的波长受(a)脉冲星血浆中的波性质严重限制,(b)梁和背景之间的分离条件,以及(c)脉冲星框架中等离子体的不均匀性。动力学不稳定性的生长速率要小得多,对于J {ü} ttner分布而言,生长波的带宽比相对流的高斯分布要大得多。对于J {ü} Ttner分布,根本没有反应不稳定性。我们得出的结论是,对于``PLASAR''PULSAR等离子体的``合理''假设的通用Pulsar无线电发射机制中没有CCE,RPE和ADE。

We consider critically the three most widely favored pulsar radio emission mechanisms: coherent curvature emission (CCE), beam-driven relativistic plasma emission (RPE) and anomalous Doppler emission (ADE). We assume that the pulsar plasma is one dimensional (1D), streaming outward with a bulk Lorentz factor $γ_{\rm s} \gg \langle γ\rangle -1 \gtrsim 1$, where $\langle γ\rangle $ is the intrinsic spread in the rest frame of the plasma. We argue that the formation of beams in a multi-cloud model is ineffective in the intrinsically relativistic case for plausible parameters, because the overtaking takes too long. We argue that the default choice for the particle distribution in the rest frame is a J{ü}ttner distribution and that relativistic streaming should be included by applying a Lorentz transformation to the rest-frame distribution, rather than the widely assumed relativistically streaming Gaussian distribution. We find that beam-driven wave growth is severely restricted by (a) the wave properties in pulsar plasma, (b) a separation condition between beam and background, and (c) the inhomogeneity of the plasma in the pulsar frame. The growth rate for the kinetic instability is much smaller and the bandwidth of the growing waves is much larger for a J{ü}ttner distribution than for a relativistically streaming Gaussian distribution. No reactive instability occurs at all for a J{ü}ttner distribution. We conclude that none of CCE, RPE and ADE in tenable as the generic pulsar radio emission mechanism for ``plausible'' assumptions about the pulsar plasma.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源