论文标题
完成的SDSS-IV扩展Baryon振荡光谱调查:Quasar样品的N体模拟挑战
The Completed SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: N-body Mock Challenge for the Quasar Sample
论文作者
论文摘要
可以使用Alcock-Paczynski效应来测量宇宙的生长速率和膨胀历史。我们验证了在Sloan数字天空调查(SDSS)的最终分析中使用的红移空间失真模型(SDSS)扩展了Baryon振荡光谱调查(EBOSS)数据发布16个类星体聚类样本,配置和傅立叶空间,使用Outerrim N-Body Simulation构成了一系列HOD模拟分类。我们测试了一系列非盲模型,在外部宇宙学中,并在新宇宙学上重新定制了盲模型,并研究了红移涂抹和灾难性的红移的影响。我们发现,对于非盲模型,这些模型能够在3%以内和$α_\ parallel $和$α_\ bot $中恢复$Fσ_8$,至1%以内。由于假设不正确的基准宇宙学,对于盲模型,测量中的散射量更大。从这个模拟挑战中,我们发现所有三个模型都表现良好,在$fσ_8$,$α_\ parallel $和$α_\ bot $上的系统错误相似,$σ_{fσ_8} = 0.013 $,$σ__{α_\ parallel} = 0.012 $ and $ c = 0.012 $ and $ = 0.012 $ and $ n8。合并共识的系统错误为$σ_{fσ_8} = 0.011 $,$σ_{α_\ Parallel} = 0.008 $和$σ_{α_\ bot} = 0.005 $,用于最终DR16分析。对于BAO的配置和傅立叶空间,我们将保守的系统错误为$σ_{α_\ Parallel} = 0.010 $和$σ_{α_\ bot} = 0.007 $。
The growth rate and expansion history of the Universe can be measured from large galaxy redshift surveys using the Alcock-Paczynski effect. We validate the Redshift Space Distortion models used in the final analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) Data Release 16 quasar clustering sample, in configuration and Fourier space, using a series of HOD mock catalogues generated using the OuterRim N-body simulation. We test three models on a series of non-blind mocks, in the OuterRim cosmology, and blind mocks, which have been rescaled to new cosmologies, and investigate the effects of redshift smearing and catastrophic redshifts. We find that for the non-blind mocks, the models are able to recover $fσ_8$ to within 3% and $α_\parallel$ and $α_\bot$ to within 1%. The scatter in the measurements is larger for the blind mocks, due to the assumption of an incorrect fiducial cosmology. From this mock challenge, we find that all three models perform well, with similar systematic errors on $fσ_8$, $α_\parallel$ and $α_\bot$ at the level of $σ_{fσ_8}=0.013$, $σ_{α_\parallel}=0.012$ and $σ_{α_\bot}=0.008$. The systematic error on the combined consensus is $σ_{fσ_8}=0.011$, $σ_{α_\parallel}=0.008$ and $σ_{α_\bot}=0.005$, which is used in the final DR16 analysis. For BAO fits in configuration and Fourier space, we take conservative systematic errors of $σ_{α_\parallel}=0.010$ and $σ_{α_\bot}=0.007$.