论文标题
从贸易最大化中获得多维的收益
On Multi-Dimensional Gains from Trade Maximization
论文作者
论文摘要
我们研究了多维双方市场的贸易收益。具体来说,我们专注于具有$ n $异质物品的设置,其中每个物品均由其他卖家$ i $所有,并且有一个受约束性约束$ \ MATHCAL {f} $的约束adddive的买家。单方面市场的多维环境,例如卖方拥有多种异构物品,但也是机械设计师的地方,这是一个很好的理解的。此外,在双面市场中的单维环境,例如在购买者和卖方每个人都寻求或拥有一件物品的地方,也得到了充分的理解。但是,多维的双面市场构成了这两种工作的主要挑战:优化出售异质物品,确保市场双方之间的激励兼容,并实施预算平衡。据我们所知,我们介绍了在多维双面市场中获得贸易收益的首个最差案例近似保证。 我们的第一个结果提供了$ o(\ log(1/r))$ - 近似与贸易中最高收益的近似值,以获得一类广泛的向下闭合可行性约束(例如Matroid,匹配,匹配,knapsack或这些相交)。在这里,$ r $是买方对物品价值超过卖方成本的所有物品的最低可能性。我们的第二个结果消除了对$ r $的依赖,并提供了无条件的$ o(\ log n)$ - 与交易中第二好的收益近似。我们将这两个结果扩展到了一般受约束的加德买家,再损失了另一个$ O(\ log n)$ - 因子。
We study gains from trade in multi-dimensional two-sided markets. Specifically, we focus on a setting with $n$ heterogeneous items, where each item is owned by a different seller $i$, and there is a constrained-additive buyer with feasibility constraint $\mathcal{F}$. Multi-dimensional settings in one-sided markets, e.g. where a seller owns multiple heterogeneous items but also is the mechanism designer, are well-understood. In addition, single-dimensional settings in two-sided markets, e.g. where a buyer and seller each seek or own a single item, are also well-understood. Multi-dimensional two-sided markets, however, encapsulate the major challenges of both lines of work: optimizing the sale of heterogeneous items, ensuring incentive-compatibility among both sides of the market, and enforcing budget balance. We present, to the best of our knowledge, the first worst-case approximation guarantee for gains from trade in a multi-dimensional two-sided market. Our first result provides an $O(\log (1/r))$-approximation to the first-best gains from trade for a broad class of downward-closed feasibility constraints (such as matroid, matching, knapsack, or the intersection of these). Here $r$ is the minimum probability over all items that a buyer's value for the item exceeds the seller's cost. Our second result removes the dependence on $r$ and provides an unconditional $O(\log n)$-approximation to the second-best gains from trade. We extend both results for a general constrained-additive buyer, losing another $O(\log n)$-factor en-route.