论文标题

划分不好比分割商品更难:关于琐事的公平有效分裂的复杂性

Dividing Bads is Harder than Dividing Goods: On the Complexity of Fair and Efficient Division of Chores

论文作者

Chaudhury, Bhaskar Ray, Garg, Jugal, McGlaughlin, Peter, Mehta, Ruta

论文摘要

我们研究了一组代理需要公平有效地将一组杂务(坏)划分的杂务问题。我们假设代理具有线性分离(成本)功能。就像商品案一样,竞争性划分也可以说是坏人的最佳机制。但是,与商品不同,有多个竞争部门,而糟糕的差异价值概况非常不同。尽管所有竞争部门都满足了公平和效率的标准概念,但某些部门比其他部门要明显公平和高效。这提出了两个重要的自然问题:是否存在一个竞争部门,没有代理人被分配给她非常不喜欢的琐事?假设存在的存在和多项式时间算法是否有足够的条件? 我们在本文中调查了这两个问题。我们表明,第一个问题是强烈的NP-HARD。此外,我们得出了这种存在的简单条件,并且我们表明,假设竞争性划分是ppad-hard假设条件。这些结果与两个问题都可以溶解的商品形成鲜明对比。据我们所知,这些是繁琐分裂问题的第一个硬度结果,实际上是在线性偏好下的任何经济模型中。

We study the chore division problem where a set of agents needs to divide a set of chores (bads) among themselves fairly and efficiently. We assume that agents have linear disutility (cost) functions. Like for the case of goods, competitive division is known to be arguably the best mechanism for the bads as well. However, unlike goods, there are multiple competitive divisions with very different disutility value profiles in bads. Although all competitive divisions satisfy the standard notions of fairness and efficiency, some divisions are significantly fairer and efficient than the others. This raises two important natural questions: Does there exist a competitive division in which no agent is assigned a chore that she hugely dislikes? Are there simple sufficient conditions for the existence and polynomial-time algorithms assuming them? We investigate both these questions in this paper. We show that the first problem is strongly NP-hard. Further, we derive a simple sufficient condition for the existence, and we show that finding a competitive division is PPAD-hard assuming the condition. These results are in sharp contrast to the case of goods where both problems are strongly polynomial-time solvable. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first hardness results for the chore division problem, and, in fact, for any economic model under linear preferences.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源