论文标题

使用深度学习预测患糖尿病性视网膜病变的风险

Predicting Risk of Developing Diabetic Retinopathy using Deep Learning

论文作者

Bora, Ashish, Balasubramanian, Siva, Babenko, Boris, Virmani, Sunny, Venugopalan, Subhashini, Mitani, Akinori, Marinho, Guilherme de Oliveira, Cuadros, Jorge, Ruamviboonsuk, Paisan, Corrado, Greg S, Peng, Lily, Webster, Dale R, Varadarajan, Avinash V, Hammel, Naama, Liu, Yun, Bavishi, Pinal

论文摘要

糖尿病性视网膜病(DR)筛查对预防失明有用,但随着糖尿病患者数量的增加,面临缩放挑战。开发DR的风险分层可能有助于优化筛查间隔以降低成本,同时改善与视力相关的结果。我们创建并验证了深度学习系统(DLS)的两个版本,以预测接受DR筛查的糖尿病患者的轻度或伤人(“轻度+”)DR的发展。这两个版本使用三场或单个彩色眼底照片(CFP)作为输入。训练集源自575,431只眼睛,其中28,899只已知2年的结果,其余的是通过多任务学习来增强训练过程。对内部验证集(集合A; 7,976眼; 3,678张有已知结果)和外部验证集(集合B; 4,762眼; 2,345; 2,345; 2,345;带有已知结果)进行了验证。为了预测DR的两年开发,在验证集A上,3型场DLS在接收器操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积为0.79(95%CI,0.78-0.81)。即使调整了可用的风险因素,DLS也是预后的(p <0.001)。当添加到风险因素中时,3局DLS从0.72(95%CI,0.68-0.76)提高到0.81(95%CI,0.77-0.84)的验证集A集合A,1-field DLS将AUC提高了AUC,AUC从0.62(95%CI,0.58-0.66)提高了AUC,在验证集合中。本研究中的DLSS确定了CFPS DR开发的预后信息。与可用的风险因素相比,此信息独立于和更有信息。

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening is instrumental in preventing blindness, but faces a scaling challenge as the number of diabetic patients rises. Risk stratification for the development of DR may help optimize screening intervals to reduce costs while improving vision-related outcomes. We created and validated two versions of a deep learning system (DLS) to predict the development of mild-or-worse ("Mild+") DR in diabetic patients undergoing DR screening. The two versions used either three-fields or a single field of color fundus photographs (CFPs) as input. The training set was derived from 575,431 eyes, of which 28,899 had known 2-year outcome, and the remaining were used to augment the training process via multi-task learning. Validation was performed on both an internal validation set (set A; 7,976 eyes; 3,678 with known outcome) and an external validation set (set B; 4,762 eyes; 2,345 with known outcome). For predicting 2-year development of DR, the 3-field DLS had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95%CI, 0.78-0.81) on validation set A. On validation set B (which contained only a single field), the 1-field DLS's AUC was 0.70 (95%CI, 0.67-0.74). The DLS was prognostic even after adjusting for available risk factors (p<0.001). When added to the risk factors, the 3-field DLS improved the AUC from 0.72 (95%CI, 0.68-0.76) to 0.81 (95%CI, 0.77-0.84) in validation set A, and the 1-field DLS improved the AUC from 0.62 (95%CI, 0.58-0.66) to 0.71 (95%CI, 0.68-0.75) in validation set B. The DLSs in this study identified prognostic information for DR development from CFPs. This information is independent of and more informative than the available risk factors.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源