论文标题
用于不均匀材料准静态机械行为的数值建模的光谱算法的开发和比较
Development and comparison of spectral algorithms for numerical modeling of the quasi-static mechanical behavior of inhomogeneous materials
论文作者
论文摘要
在当前的工作中,基于傅立叶级数的两个不同离散化的周期性(准静态)线性弹性机械边界值问题(BVP)的数值解决方案进行了许多算法和比较。第一个是标准的,基于傅立叶模式积分的梯形近似,导致截短的傅立叶级数的梯形离散化(TD)。较少的标准是基于傅立叶模式集成的分段恒定近似值的第二个离散化,从而产生了本系列的分段恒定离散化(PCD)。采用这些固定点算法是通过绿色功能预处理(GFP)和有限差分离散化(差分运算符; FDD)来提出的。特别是,在PCD的背景下,其中包括一种基于Eloh等人最近引入的所谓“离散绿色操作员”(DGO)的算法。 (2019年),使用GFP,但不使用FDD。为了进行计算比较,采用了嵌入矩阵中的立方包含的(经典)基准案例(例如Suquet,1997; Willot,2015)。考虑到弹性刚度(MI)界面处的弹性刚度中的不连续和平滑转变。在TD和PCD的背景下,开发了许多基于GFP和FDD的算法。其中,一个基于所谓的平均偏见 - 差异(AFB)的一种证明会导致收敛速度的最大改善。事实证明,AFB等同于TD背景下Willot(2015)的“旋转方案”(R)。在PCD的背景下,基于AFB/R-和DGO的算法的性能和收敛行为的比较表明,对于大相比,前者比后者更有效。
In the current work, a number of algorithms are developed and compared for the numerical solution of periodic (quasi-static) linear elastic mechanical boundary-value problems (BVPs) based on two different discretizations of Fourier series. The first is standard and based on the trapezoidal approximation of the Fourier mode integral, resulting in trapezoidal discretization (TD) of the truncated Fourier series. Less standard is the second discretization based on piecewise-constant approximation of the Fourier mode integrand, yielding a piecewise-constant discretization (PCD) of this series. Employing these, fixed-point algorithms are formulated via Green-function preconditioning (GFP) and finite-difference discretization (of differential operators; FDD). In particular, in the context of PCD, this includes an algorithm based on the so-called "discrete Green operator" (DGO) recently introduced by Eloh et al. (2019), which employs GFP, but not FDD. For computational comparisons, the (classic) benchmark case of a cubic inclusion embedded in a matrix (e.g., Suquet, 1997; Willot, 2015) is employed. Both discontinuous and smooth transitions in elastic stiffness at the matrix-inclusion (MI) interface are considered. In the context of both TD and PCD, a number of GFP- and FDD-based algorithms are developed. Among these, one based on so-called averaged-forward-backward-differencing (AFB) is shown to result in the greatest improvement in convergence rate. As it turns out, AFB is equivalent to the "rotated scheme" (R) of Willot (2015) in the context of TD. In the context of PCD, comparison of the performance and convergence behavior of AFB/R- and DGO-based algorithms shows that the former is more efficient than the latter for larger phase contrasts.