论文标题

“这是Qoconcence的吗?”:Quat上Qanon的探索性研究

"Is it a Qoincidence?": An Exploratory Study of QAnon on Voat

论文作者

Papasavva, Antonis, Blackburn, Jeremy, Stringhini, Gianluca, Zannettou, Savvas, De Cristofaro, Emiliano

论文摘要

在线边缘社区为寻求和分享想法的用户提供肥沃的理由,以激发人们怀疑主流新闻和阴谋理论。其中,Qanon阴谋论于2017年出现在4Chan上,广泛地支持了这样的观念,即强大的政治家,贵族和名人紧密地参与了全球恋童癖环。同时,由于民主选举的官员是民主的假陈列室,政府被认为是由“木偶大师”控制的。 本文提供了对Reddit风格的新闻汇总者Voat.co上Qanon社区的经验探索性分析,该社区对媒体的毒性产生了兴趣,并为Qanon追随者提供了平台。更确切地说,我们分析了 /v /greatawakening的大型数据集,这是最流行的QANON相关的倒数(subevers voat等效),以表征活动和用户参与度。为了进一步了解Qanon的论述,我们研究了帖子中提到的最受欢迎的命名实体,以及讨论中最杰出的主题,这些主题侧重于美国政治,唐纳德·特朗普和世界活动。我们还使用单词嵌入来识别Qanon特定关键字的叙述。我们的图表可视化表明,一些与QANON相关的图形与比萨法阴谋论和所谓的“ Q”所谓的滴滴密切相关。最后,我们分析了内容毒性,发现有关 /v /greatawakening的讨论比广泛的VOAT社区的毒性要小。

Online fringe communities offer fertile grounds for users seeking and sharing ideas fueling suspicion of mainstream news and conspiracy theories. Among these, the QAnon conspiracy theory emerged in 2017 on 4chan, broadly supporting the idea that powerful politicians, aristocrats, and celebrities are closely engaged in a global pedophile ring. Simultaneously, governments are thought to be controlled by "puppet masters," as democratically elected officials serve as a fake showroom of democracy. This paper provides an empirical exploratory analysis of the QAnon community on Voat.co, a Reddit-esque news aggregator, which has captured the interest of the press for its toxicity and for providing a platform to QAnon followers. More precisely, we analyze a large dataset from /v/GreatAwakening, the most popular QAnon-related subverse (the Voat equivalent of a subreddit), to characterize activity and user engagement. To further understand the discourse around QAnon, we study the most popular named entities mentioned in the posts, along with the most prominent topics of discussion, which focus on US politics, Donald Trump, and world events. We also use word embeddings to identify narratives around QAnon-specific keywords. Our graph visualization shows that some of the QAnon-related ones are closely related to those from the Pizzagate conspiracy theory and so-called drops by "Q." Finally, we analyze content toxicity, finding that discussions on /v/GreatAwakening are less toxic than in the broad Voat community.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源