论文标题
调查宇宙中午的大规模静态星系的不断增长
Investigating The Growing Population of Massive Quiescent Galaxies at Cosmic Noon
论文作者
论文摘要
我们使用28,469个大量样品($ M_ \ star \ ge 10^{11} $ M $ _ \ odot $)的样本在Redshifts $ 1.5 <z <3.0 $中,从17.5摄氏度$^2 $区域(0.33 gpc $^3 $ comcovs comcovs compovs compovs complys)。这允许对静态分数进行强有力的研究,这是$ 1.5 <z <3.0 $的函数,样品$ \ sim $ \ sim $ 40倍在日志上($ m _ {\ star} $/$ \ rm m _ {\ odot} $ \ ge11.5 $。我们使用三种方法得出静态分数:特定的恒星形成率,距主序列的距离和UVJ颜色选择。所有三种方法都给出了$ 1.5 <z <2.0 $的相似值,但是结果不同于$ 2.0 <z <3.0 $的两倍。在红移时,$ 1.5 <z <3.0 $,静物分数随着恒星质量的函数而增加。大爆炸后,$ z = 2 $,只有3.3 Gyr,宇宙已经淬火了$ \ sim $ \ sim $ 25%的$ m_ \ star = 10^{11} $ m $ _ \ odot $ galaxies和$ \ sim $ \ sim $ 45%的$ M_ \ star = 10^{12} {12} $ _ $ _ $ _ \ odot $ $ $ $ $ $ GALAXIES。我们讨论了一系列时代和环境的物理机制,这些机制可以解释我们的结果。我们将结果与流体动力模拟的预测Simba和Illustristng和半分析模型(SAM)SAG,SAGE和GALACTICUS进行了比较。来自Illustristng的静止分数高于我们的经验结果2-5美元,而来自Simba和三个SAM的静态结果则低于1.5-10美元的$ 1.5 <z <z <3.0 $。
We explore the buildup of quiescent galaxies using a sample of 28,469 massive ($M_\star \ge 10^{11}$M$_\odot$) galaxies at redshifts $1.5<z<3.0$, drawn from a 17.5 deg$^2$ area (0.33 Gpc$^3$ comoving volume at these redshifts). This allows for a robust study of the quiescent fraction as a function of mass at $1.5<z<3.0$ with a sample $\sim$40 times larger at log($M_{\star}$/$\rm M_{\odot}$)$\ge11.5$ than previous studies. We derive the quiescent fraction using three methods: specific star-formation rate, distance from the main sequence, and UVJ color-color selection. All three methods give similar values at $1.5<z<2.0$, however the results differ by up to a factor of two at $2.0<z<3.0$. At redshifts $1.5 < z < 3.0$ the quiescent fraction increases as a function of stellar mass. By $z=2$, only 3.3 Gyr after the Big Bang, the universe has quenched $\sim$25% of $M_\star = 10^{11}$M$_\odot$ galaxies and $\sim$45% of $M_\star = 10^{12}$M$_\odot$ galaxies. We discuss physical mechanisms across a range of epochs and environments that could explain our results. We compare our results with predictions from hydrodynamical simulations SIMBA and IllustrisTNG and semi-analytic models (SAMs) SAG, SAGE, and Galacticus. The quiescent fraction from IllustrisTNG is higher than our empirical result by a factor of $2-5$, while those from SIMBA and the three SAMs are lower by a factor of $1.5-10$ at $1.5<z<3.0$.