论文标题

调查宇宙中午的大规模静态星系的不断增长

Investigating The Growing Population of Massive Quiescent Galaxies at Cosmic Noon

论文作者

Sherman, Sydney, Jogee, Shardha, Florez, Jonathan, Stevans, Matthew L., Kawinwanichakij, Lalitwadee, Wold, Isak, Finkelstein, Steven L., Papovich, Casey, Ciardullo, Robin, Gronwall, Caryl, Cora, Sofía A., Hough, Tomás, Vega-Martínez, Cristian A.

论文摘要

我们使用28,469个大量样品($ M_ \ star \ ge 10^{11} $ M $ _ \ odot $)的样本在Redshifts $ 1.5 <z <3.0 $中,从17.5摄氏度$^2 $区域(0.33 gpc $^3 $ comcovs comcovs compovs compovs complys)。这允许对静态分数进行强有力的研究,这是$ 1.5 <z <3.0 $的函数,样品$ \ sim $ \ sim $ 40倍在日志上($ m _ {\ star} $/$ \ rm m _ {\ odot} $ \ ge11.5 $。我们使用三种方法得出静态分数:特定的恒星形成率,距主序列的距离和UVJ颜色选择。所有三种方法都给出了$ 1.5 <z <2.0 $的相似值,但是结果不同于$ 2.0 <z <3.0 $的两倍。在红移时,$ 1.5 <z <3.0 $,静物分数随着恒星质量的函数而增加。大爆炸后,$ z = 2 $,只有3.3 Gyr,宇宙已经淬火了$ \ sim $ \ sim $ 25%的$ m_ \ star = 10^{11} $ m $ _ \ odot $ galaxies和$ \ sim $ \ sim $ 45%的$ M_ \ star = 10^{12} {12} $ _ $ _ $ _ \ odot $ $ $ $ $ $ GALAXIES。我们讨论了一系列时代和环境的物理机制,这些机制可以解释我们的结果。我们将结果与流体动力模拟的预测Simba和Illustristng和半分析模型(SAM)SAG,SAGE和GALACTICUS进行了比较。来自Illustristng的静止分数高于我们的经验结果2-5美元,而来自Simba和三个SAM的静态结果则低于1.5-10美元的$ 1.5 <z <z <3.0 $。

We explore the buildup of quiescent galaxies using a sample of 28,469 massive ($M_\star \ge 10^{11}$M$_\odot$) galaxies at redshifts $1.5<z<3.0$, drawn from a 17.5 deg$^2$ area (0.33 Gpc$^3$ comoving volume at these redshifts). This allows for a robust study of the quiescent fraction as a function of mass at $1.5<z<3.0$ with a sample $\sim$40 times larger at log($M_{\star}$/$\rm M_{\odot}$)$\ge11.5$ than previous studies. We derive the quiescent fraction using three methods: specific star-formation rate, distance from the main sequence, and UVJ color-color selection. All three methods give similar values at $1.5<z<2.0$, however the results differ by up to a factor of two at $2.0<z<3.0$. At redshifts $1.5 < z < 3.0$ the quiescent fraction increases as a function of stellar mass. By $z=2$, only 3.3 Gyr after the Big Bang, the universe has quenched $\sim$25% of $M_\star = 10^{11}$M$_\odot$ galaxies and $\sim$45% of $M_\star = 10^{12}$M$_\odot$ galaxies. We discuss physical mechanisms across a range of epochs and environments that could explain our results. We compare our results with predictions from hydrodynamical simulations SIMBA and IllustrisTNG and semi-analytic models (SAMs) SAG, SAGE, and Galacticus. The quiescent fraction from IllustrisTNG is higher than our empirical result by a factor of $2-5$, while those from SIMBA and the three SAMs are lower by a factor of $1.5-10$ at $1.5<z<3.0$.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源