论文标题
使用人类推理的非贫困存在假设的论点
An Argument for the Non-Arbitrary Existence Hypothesis using Anthropic Reasoning
论文作者
论文摘要
本文使用拟人推理来争论非肢体存在假设（NAEH）。将Nick Bostrom的自我采样假设（SSA）与NAEH相结合，与没有这种假设的SSA进行了比较，也将SSA与自我指示假设（SIA）进行了比较。当根据各种思想实验（包括孵化器Gedanken，世界末日论证），自以为是的哲学家和Bostrom的Adam和Eve Thought实验中考虑时，发现具有NAEH的SSA可以给出最合理的结果。还讨论了本文中未明确考虑的原则的可能性，但发现有限的合理性。
This paper uses anthropic reasoning to argue for the Non-Arbitrary Existence Hypothesis (NAEH). Nick Bostrom's Self-Sampling Assumption (SSA) combined with NAEH is compared against SSA without such an assumption and also SSA with the Self-Indication Assumption (SIA). When considered in the light of various thought experiments, including the Incubator Gedanken, the Doomsday Argument, the Presumptuous Philosopher and Bostrom's Adam and Eve thought experiments, SSA with NAEH is found to give the most plausible results. The possibility of principles not explicitly considered in the paper being superior also is discussed but found to have limited plausibility.
