论文标题
在银河形成模拟中,恒星反馈对IMF平均与IMF采样的敏感性
The sensitivity of stellar feedback to IMF averaging versus IMF sampling in galaxy formation simulations
论文作者
论文摘要
银河形成模拟经常使用初始质量函数(IMF)平均反馈处方,其中假定星形粒子代表完全采样IMF的单个恒星种群。这种近似在高质量分辨率下分解,在恒星种群中的随机变化变得很重要。我们讨论各种方案,以从IMF明确采样的恒星质量填充恒星颗粒。我们使用Monte Carlo数值实验来检查方案以公正的方式重现IMF的能力,同时保存质量。我们提出了我们的首选方案,可以很容易地添加到预先存在的恒星形成处方中。然后,我们对具有超新星,光电离和光电加热的矮星系进行了一系列高分辨率隔离模拟,以比较使用IMF平均反馈与明确采样IMF之间的差异。我们发现,如果超新星是反馈的唯一形式,则触发IMF平均速率的单个超新星为IMF采样提供了相同的结果。但是,我们发现,当使用IMF平均速率时,光电离是在调节星形形成方面更有效,而与IMF采样产生的稀有,明亮的来源相比,HII更小,更小的H II区域。我们注意到,IMF平均反馈与IMF采样的效率提高不一定是一般趋势,并且可能会根据反馈渠道,分辨率和其他细节而反转。但是,IMF采样始终是更具身体动机的方法。我们保守地建议将其用于巨大的恒星粒子,而不是$ \ sim500 \,\ mathrm {m_ \ odot} $。
Galaxy formation simulations frequently use Initial Mass Function (IMF) averaged feedback prescriptions, where star particles are assumed to represent single stellar populations that fully sample the IMF. This approximation breaks down at high mass resolution, where stochastic variations in stellar populations become important. We discuss various schemes to populate star particles with stellar masses explicitly sampled from the IMF. We use Monte Carlo numerical experiments to examine the ability of the schemes to reproduce an input IMF in an unbiased manner while conserving mass. We present our preferred scheme which can easily be added to pre-existing star formation prescriptions. We then carry out a series of high resolution isolated simulations of dwarf galaxies with supernovae, photoionization and photoelectric heating to compare the differences between using IMF averaged feedback and explicitly sampling the IMF. We find that if supernovae are the only form of feedback, triggering individual supernovae from IMF averaged rates gives identical results to IMF sampling. However, we find that photoionization is more effective at regulating star formation when IMF averaged rates are used, creating more, smaller H II regions than the rare, bright sources produced by IMF sampling. We note that the increased efficiency of the IMF averaged feedback versus IMF sampling is not necessarily a general trend and may be reversed depending on feedback channel, resolution and other details. However, IMF sampling is always the more physically motivated approach. We conservatively suggest that it should be used for star particles less massive than $\sim500\,\mathrm{M_\odot}$.