论文标题
基于自适应连续小波变换和分析的信号分离
Signal Separation Based on Adaptive Continuous Wavelet Transform and Analysis
论文作者
论文摘要
最近,同步转换(SST)是作为经验模式分解(EMD)的工具开发的,以增强多组分非平台信号的时频分辨率和能量浓度,并提供更准确的组件恢复。为了恢复各个组件,SST方法由两个步骤组成。首先,从SST平面估算组件的瞬时频率(IF)。其次,如果恢复了,则相关组件是通过沿SST平面上的估计曲线确定积分计算的。组件的重建精度在很大程度上取决于在第一步中进行的IFS估计的准确性。最近,引入了一种直接的时频方法方法,称为信号分离操作(SSO),用于多组分信号分离。虽然SST和SSO在数学上都在估计上都很严格,但SSO避免了组件恢复中的两步SST方法的第二步(模式检索)。 SSO方法基于短时傅立叶变换的某些变体。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于自适应连续小波样转换(CWLT)的直接信号分离方法,通过引入基于自适应CWLT的两个模型以基于自适应CWLT的信号分离方法:基于正弦信号的模型和基于线性的Chirp模型,这些模型分别从Sinolesial Signal Signal Signal近似值和局限性近似时间内固定,这些模型分别得出。更准确的组件恢复公式是从线性CHIRP局部近似得出的。我们介绍了我们方法的理论分析。对于每个模型,我们为IF估计和组件恢复建立误差界限。
Recently the synchrosqueezed transform (SST) was developed as an empirical mode decomposition (EMD)-like tool to enhance the time-frequency resolution and energy concentration of a multi-component non-stationary signal and provides more accurate component recovery. To recover individual components, the SST method consists of two steps. First the instantaneous frequency (IF) of a component is estimated from the SST plane. Secondly, after IF is recovered, the associated component is computed by a definite integral along the estimated IF curve on the SST plane. The reconstruction accuracy for a component depends heavily on the accuracy of the IFs estimation carried out in the first step. More recently, a direct method of the time-frequency approach, called signal separation operation (SSO), was introduced for multi-component signal separation. While both SST and SSO are mathematically rigorous on IF estimation, SSO avoids the second step of the two-step SST method in component recovery (mode retrieval). The SSO method is based on some variant of the short-time Fourier transform. In the present paper, we propose a direct method of signal separation based on the adaptive continuous wavelet-like transform (CWLT) by introducing two models of the adaptive CWLT-based approach for signal separation: the sinusoidal signal-based model and the linear chirp-based model, which are derived respectively from sinusoidal signal approximation and the linear chirp approximation at any time instant. A more accurate component recovery formula is derived from linear chirp local approximation. We present the theoretical analysis of our approach. For each model, we establish the error bounds for IF estimation and component recovery.