论文标题

黑洞中子恒星系统带有旋转黑洞的高准确波形

High-accuracy waveforms for black hole-neutron star systems with spinning black holes

论文作者

Foucart, Francois, Chernoglazov, Alexander, Boyle, Michael, Hinderer, Tanja, Miller, Max, Moxon, Jordan, Scheel, Mark A., Deppe, Nils, Duez, Matthew D., Hebert, Francois, Kidder, Lawrence E., Throwe, William, Pfeiffer, Harald P.

论文摘要

准确的数值波形的可用性是重力波天体物理学可靠波形模型的创建和校准的重要要求。对于黑洞中的恒星二进制文件,很少有准确的波形可公开使用。最新的模型经过校准,可用于大量较旧的模拟,具有良好的参数空间覆盖范围,用于低自旋非不必要的二进制文件,但准确性有限,并且较小数量的更长,最新的模拟仅限于非旋转黑洞。在本文中,我们为三个新系统提供了长而准确的数值波形,包括快速旋转黑洞和一种进攻型配置。我们详细研究了模拟的准确性,尤其是在BHNS二进制中首次执行的详细比较波形外推方法与Cauchy特征提取结果的详细比较。新的波形具有$ <0.1 \,{\ rm rad} $相位错误,在合并中上升到$ \ sim(0.2-0.4)\,{\ rm rad} $错误,以及$ \ simsim 1 \%$ $ $ $错误。我们对这些数值结果计算了最近的分析模型的忠诚度,并发现专门为BHNS二进制文件设计的模型表现良好($ f> 0.99 $),可触及面对面。对于边缘的观察,特别是对于进攻系统,模型和模拟之间的分歧增加,包括进步和/或高阶模式在内的模型开始比目前缺乏这些功能的BHNS模型更好。

The availability of accurate numerical waveforms is an important requirement for the creation and calibration of reliable waveform models for gravitational wave astrophysics. For black hole-neutron star binaries, very few accurate waveforms are however publicly available. Most recent models are calibrated to a large number of older simulations with good parameter space coverage for low-spin non-precessing binaries but limited accuracy, and a much smaller number of longer, more recent simulations limited to non-spinning black holes. In this paper, we present long, accurate numerical waveforms for three new systems that include rapidly spinning black holes, and one precessing configuration. We study in detail the accuracy of the simulations, and in particular perform for the first time in the context of BHNS binaries a detailed comparison of waveform extrapolation methods to the results of Cauchy Characteristic Extraction. The new waveforms have $<0.1\,{\rm rad}$ phase errors during inspiral, rising to $\sim (0.2-0.4)\,{\rm rad}$ errors at merger, and $\lesssim 1\%$ error in their amplitude. We compute the faithfulness of recent analytical models to these numerical results, and find that models specifically designed for BHNS binaries perform well ($F>0.99$) for binaries seen face-on. For edge-on observations, particularly for precessing systems, disagreements between models and simulations increase, and models that include precession and/or higher-order modes start to perform better than BHNS models that currently lack these features.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源