论文标题
评论“首先观察$^{183} $ au [phys。Rev。lett。125，132501（2015）]中的多种不同种类的多个横向摆动带
Comment on "First Observation of Multiple Transverse Wobbling Bands of Different Kinds in $^{183}$Au [Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 132501 (2015)]"
论文作者
论文摘要
在[S. Nandi等人，物理。莱特牧师。 125，132501（2020）]报告了两条横向摇摆带，以$^{183} $ au。该分配的关键实验证明是E2主导的摇摆和正常带之间的转变，这是通过拟合测得的DCO比和极化结果来支持的。但是，根据统计误差的分析，不确定性被显着低估。有了合理的错误，不能仅确定混合率，并且不能排除M1主导的字符，表明摇摆分配仍然值得怀疑。
In [S. Nandi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 132501 (2020)] two transverse wobbling bands were reported in $^{183}$Au. The critical experimental proof for this assignment is the E2 dominated linking transitions between the wobbling and normal bands, which are supported by fitting the measured DCO ratio and polarization results. However, the uncertainties are significantly underestimated according to an analysis on the statistical error. With reasonable error, the mixing ratios cannot be exclusively decided, and the M1 dominated character cannot be excluded, indicating that the wobbling assignment is still questionable.
