论文标题
优化传感器放置在复杂网络中以定位隐藏信号来源:评论
Optimizing sensors placement in complex networks for localization of hidden signal source: A review
论文作者
论文摘要
随着世界变得越来越互连,我们的日常对象成为物联网的一部分,我们的生活在虚拟现实中变得越来越反映,其中每一个信息,包括错误信息,假新闻和恶意软件,实际上可以匿名地传播得非常快。为了抑制这种不受控制的传播,必须开发能够追踪这种恶意信息传播的有效计算机系统和算法。当前,源定位的最有效方法是基于传感器,这些传感器提供了它们检测到〜的时间的时间。我们研究了此类传感器在复杂网络中最佳放置的问题,并提出了一种称为“集体融合”的新图表,我们将其与其他四个指标进行了比较。在传感器密度和信号的随机性的范围内,对不同类型的复杂网络进行了广泛的数值测试。在这些测试中,我们发现了研究最佳或无尺度合成网络与窄度分布网络之间研究的最佳放置方法的比较性能明显差异。与后者相比,前者具有明确的区域,而后者的性能图不那么均匀。我们发现,尽管选择最佳方法是非常网络和依赖性的,但有两种始终突出的方法。较高的差异观察者似乎对较低的随机性差异表现非常好,而本文中引入的集体群体在高度不可预测的情况下会蓬勃发展。
As the world becomes more and more interconnected, our everyday objects become part of the Internet of Things, and our lives get more and more mirrored in virtual reality, where every piece of~information, including misinformation, fake news and malware, can spread very fast practically anonymously. To suppress such uncontrolled spread, efficient computer systems and algorithms capable to~track down such malicious information spread have to be developed. Currently, the most effective methods for source localization are based on sensors which provide the times at which they detect the~spread. We investigate the problem of the optimal placement of such sensors in complex networks and propose a new graph measure, called Collective Betweenness, which we compare against four other metrics. Extensive numerical tests are performed on different types of complex networks over the wide ranges of densities of sensors and stochasticities of signal. In these tests, we discovered clear difference in comparative performance of the investigated optimal placement methods between real or scale-free synthetic networks versus narrow degree distribution networks. The former have a clear region for any given method's dominance in contrast to the latter where the performance maps are less homogeneous. We find that while choosing the best method is very network and spread dependent, there are two methods that consistently stand out. High Variance Observers seem to do very well for spread with low stochasticity whereas Collective Betwenness, introduced in this paper, thrives when the spread is highly unpredictable.