论文标题
全息CFT和$(2+1)$ dimensions的免费费用之间的相似之处令人惊讶
A Surprising Similarity Between Holographic CFTs and a Free Fermion in $(2+1)$ Dimensions
论文作者
论文摘要
我们比较了超级时空上的各种$(2+1)$ - 尺寸CFT的真空自由能(即Casimir能量)的行为,这是空间几何形状的函数。我们认为的CFT是一个自由的Dirac Fermion,共耦合标量和全息CFT,我们以空间几何形状为圆形球体的轴对称变形。使用热内核方法计算费米亚和标量的自由能。全息CFT的自由能是通过我们在此处介绍的新方法从静态的,渐近的双几何几何进行数值计算的。我们发现,这两种自由理论的自由能在质量上是相似的,这是球形变形的函数,但我们还发现全息CFT与自由费米昂具有显着而神秘的定量相似性。鉴于全息CFT的强烈耦合,该协议尤其令人惊讶。在我们能够准确执行计算的变形范围内,标量和费米昂差异高达50%,而全息CFT与费米昂不同。
We compare the behavior of the vacuum free energy (i.e. the Casimir energy) of various $(2+1)$-dimensional CFTs on an ultrastatic spacetime as a function of the spatial geometry. The CFTs we consider are a free Dirac fermion, the conformally-coupled scalar, and a holographic CFT, and we take the spatial geometry to be an axisymmetric deformation of the round sphere. The free energies of the fermion and of the scalar are computed numerically using heat kernel methods; the free energy of the holographic CFT is computed numerically from a static, asymptotically AdS dual geometry using a novel approach we introduce here. We find that the free energy of the two free theories is qualitatively similar as a function of the sphere deformation, but we also find that the holographic CFT has a remarkable and mysterious quantitative similarity to the free fermion; this agreement is especially surprising given that the holographic CFT is strongly-coupled. Over the wide ranges of deformations for which we are able to perform the computations accurately, the scalar and fermion differ by up to 50% whereas the holographic CFT differs from the fermion by less than one percent.