论文标题
宇宙学交织：粒子物理，天体物理学和宇宙学的综述与宇宙张力和异常相关
Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies
论文作者
论文摘要
在本文中，我们将列出一些重要的目标，这些目标还需要考虑到不同的宇宙学探针之间的当前不一致（例如，hubble常数$ h_0 $，$σ_8$ - $ s_8 $ - $ s_8 $张力和其他统计学意义的统计意义较小的疾病，等不同的宇宙探针之间的不一致。尽管这些不一致仍然可能是系统错误的部分结果，但经过数年的准确分析后，它们的持久性强烈暗示了标准宇宙学场景中的裂缝以及超出标准模型以外的新物理学或概括的必要性。在本文中，我们专注于{\ it planck} cmb估算哈勃常数$ h_0 $和SH0ES协作测量的$ 5.0 \σ$张力。在展示了使用不同的方法和几何校准从不同团队进行的$ H_0 $评估之后，我们列出了一些有趣的新物理模型，这些模型可以减轻这种张力，并讨论未来十年的实验如何至关重要。此外，我们关注{\ it Planck} CMB数据的张力，具有弱透镜测量和红移调查，关于物质能量密度$ω_m$的值以及结构增长的幅度或幅度或速度（$σ_8，Fσ_8$）。我们列出了一些用于减轻这种张力的有趣模型，并讨论了尝试使用单个模型拟合一系列数据的重要性，而不仅仅是一个参数。此外，我们在统计显着性水平低于$ h_0 $ - $ s_8 $张力的统计显着性水平下，提出了许多其他较少讨论的异常，这也可能构成新物理学的暗示，我们讨论了可能集体解释这些信号的非标准性质的通用理论方法。
In this paper we will list a few important goals that need to be addressed in the next decade, also taking into account the current discordances between the different cosmological probes, such as the disagreement in the value of the Hubble constant $H_0$, the $σ_8$--$S_8$ tension, and other less statistically significant anomalies. While these discordances can still be in part the result of systematic errors, their persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the necessity for new physics or generalisations beyond the standard model. In this paper, we focus on the $5.0\,σ$ tension between the {\it Planck} CMB estimate of the Hubble constant $H_0$ and the SH0ES collaboration measurements. After showing the $H_0$ evaluations made from different teams using different methods and geometric calibrations, we list a few interesting new physics models that could alleviate this tension and discuss how the next decade's experiments will be crucial. Moreover, we focus on the tension of the {\it Planck} CMB data with weak lensing measurements and redshift surveys, about the value of the matter energy density $Ω_m$, and the amplitude or rate of the growth of structure ($σ_8,fσ_8$). We list a few interesting models proposed for alleviating this tension, and we discuss the importance of trying to fit a full array of data with a single model and not just one parameter at a time. Additionally, we present a wide range of other less discussed anomalies at a statistical significance level lower than the $H_0$--$S_8$ tensions which may also constitute hints towards new physics, and we discuss possible generic theoretical approaches that can collectively explain the non-standard nature of these signals.[Abridged]
