论文标题
学术流动性的许多方面及其对学者职业的影响
The many facets of academic mobility and its impact on scholars' career
论文作者
论文摘要
学术界的国际流动性可以增强研究人员的人力和社会资本,从而增强其科学成果。但是,对具有不同社会人口统计学特征的学者之间的不同流动性模式仍然非常有限。这项研究的目的是双重的。首先,我们调查了与研究人员的活动性相关的个体因素在多大程度上。其次,我们探索流动性与科学活动与影响之间的关系。为此,我们使用了文献计量学方法来跟踪作者的移动性。为了比较研究人员的科学成果,我们考虑了出版物的数量,并接受了引用作为指标,以及所有出版物中独特的合着者的数量。我们还分析了研究人员的共同作者网络,并比较了移动和非移动研究人员的中心度度量。结果表明,来自北美和撒哈拉以南非洲的研究人员,尤其是女性,尤其是女性,分别对国际流动性的趋势最低。拥有国际合着者增加了国际运动的可能性。我们的发现揭示了跨科学领域和国家的国际流动性的性别不平等。在整个性别中,物理科学领域的研究人员的流动性最低。我们在高级职业阶段观察到社会科学家的流动性更大,而其他领域的研究人员更喜欢在早期的职业阶段搬家。此外,我们发现流动性和科学结果之间存在正相关,但女性和男性之间没有明显的差异。比较共同创作网络中移动和非动物研究人员的中心性,这对移动研究人员的社会资本优势更高。
International mobility in academia can enhance the human and social capital of researchers and consequently their scientific outcome. However, there is still a very limited understanding of the different mobility patterns among scholars with various socio-demographic characteristics. The aim of this study is twofold. First, we investigate to what extent individual factors associate with the mobility of researchers. Second, we explore the relationship between mobility and scientific activity and impact. For this purpose, we used a bibliometric approach to track the mobility of authors. To compare the scientific outcomes of researchers, we considered the number of publications and received citations as indicators, as well as the number of unique co-authors in all their publications. We also analysed the co-authorship network of researchers and compared centrality measures of mobile and non-mobile researchers. Results show that researchers from North America and Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly female ones, have the lowest, respectively, highest tendency towards international mobility. Having international co-authors increases the probability of international movement. Our findings uncover gender inequality in international mobility across scientific fields and countries. Across genders, researchers in the Physical sciences have the most and in the Social sciences the least rate of mobility. We observed more mobility for Social scientists at the advanced career stage, while researchers in other fields prefer to move at earlier career stages. Also, we found a positive correlation between mobility and scientific outcomes, but no apparent difference between females and males. Comparing the centrality of mobile and non-mobile researchers in the co-authorship networks reveals a higher social capital advantage for mobile researchers.