论文标题
对荷兰的荒地经济评估实践的评论：我们是否向前迈进？
A review of heath economic evaluation practice in the Netherlands: are we moving forward?
论文作者
论文摘要
2016年，荷兰国家卫生保健研究所发布了新的指南，汇总并更新了有关进行经济评估的关键要素的先前建议。但是，在设计，方法论和报告选择方面引入准则后，对标准实践的影响仍然不确定。为了评估这一影响，我们检查并比较了并比较荷兰（2010- 2015年）和之后（2016-2020）在荷兰进行的经济评估的关键分析组成部分。我们特别关注分析的两个方面，这些方面对于确定结果的合理性至关重要：统计方法论和缺少数据处理。我们的综述表明，根据有关更透明和高级分析方法的新建议，经济评估的有多少组成部分发生了变化。但是，根据支持丢失数据方法的选择的统计软件和信息，确定了潜在的局限性。
In 2016, the Dutch National Health Care Institute issued new guidelines that aggregated and updated previous recommendations on key elements for conducting economic evaluation. However, the impact on standard practice after the introduction of the guidelines in terms of design, methodology and reporting choices, is still uncertain. To assess this impact, we examine and compare key analysis components of economic evaluations conducted in the Netherlands before (2010-2015) and after (2016-2020) the introduction of the guidelines. We specifically focus on two aspects of the analysis that are crucial in determining the plausibility of the results: statistical methodology and missing data handling. Our review shows how many components of economic evaluations have changed in accordance with the new recommendations towards more transparent and advanced analytic approaches. However, potential limitations are identified in terms of the statistical software and information provided to support the choice of missing data methods.
