论文标题
Hipparchus评论的天文分析
An astronomical analysis of Hipparchus' Commentaries
论文作者
论文摘要
河马被认为是上古的最伟大的天文学家。但是，他的名气是因为他所做的，或者写的或写了几个一代或几个cen turies后来写过的科学家所做的事情，而是要多于他的名声：最重要的是托勒密。宣布的时期与阿尔玛格斯特（Almagest）恒星目录之间的明显差异导致人们相信，卡塔（Cata-logue）实际上是希帕奇斯（Hipparchus）实现的。这个因素为提高了他的名声而造成了巨大贡献，这损害了托勒密的一个。但是，迄今为止，迄今为止，从未对我们重新看出的Hipparchus的唯一作品，对Aratus和Eudoxus现象的评论，到目前为止从未通过NEC-埃斯塔尔的精度进行分析。这样的检查是第一次在这里进行的，它揭示了一个与东正教史学所代表的科学家截然不同的科学家，旨在避免避免持续奇异错误的试图，即判断学者的价值不是由他的作品的现有部分来判断的价值，而只是由那些缺少的人来判断。
Hipparchus is considered the greatest astronomer of antiquity. However, his fame is due, more than to what he has done, or said, or written, to what the scientists of some generation or of a few cen-turies later have written of him: above all Ptolemy. The obvious discrepancy between the declared period and the real one of the stellar catalogue of the Almagest has led to the belief that the cata-logue was in reality made by Hipparchus. This factor has contributed greatly to increase his fame, to the detriment of the one of Ptolemy. However, the only work of Hipparchus that we have re-ceived, Commentaries on Aratus and Eudoxus phenomena, has never been analyzed with the nec-essary accuracy so far. Such an examination, which is carried out here for the first time, reveals a very different scientist from the one represented by orthodox historiography and is intended as an attempt to avoid the continuation of a singular error, that of judging the value of a scholar not by the existing parts of his work, but only by those that are missing.
