论文标题

数据正义故事:案例研究的存储库

Data Justice Stories: A Repository of Case Studies

论文作者

Leslie, David, Briggs, Morgan, Perini, Antonella, Jayadeva, Smera, Rincón, Cami, Raval, Noopur, Birhane, Abeba, Powell, Rosamund, Katell, Michael, Aitken, Mhairi

论文摘要

“数据正义”的想法是最近的学术年份。在过去的十年中,它在盎格鲁 - 欧洲的研究机构中一直在努力批评对能力动态的批评,这些动力是基于加速数据局势的趋势的基础,并承诺社会正义的原则 - 对社会成就的实现的原则,即使是公平的,公平的态度,并能够使这种不公正的根源相互构成,使他们有能力弥补,这似乎是不可接受的。加入了对塑造数字和“大数据”革命的权力失衡的批评,并致力于社会公平和建设性的社会转型,具有更深层次的历史,并且在地理上更加多样化。随着数据正义倡议,行动主义和倡导的故事所包含的,全球的数据正义实践在很大程度上是在当代学术话语中阐述和结晶的阐述和结晶之前。在讲述这些数据正义故事时,我们希望为读者提供两个相互依存的数据正义思维工具:首先,我们旨在为读者提供识别以微妙而明确的权力,统治和胁迫形式表现出的数据正义所需的关键杠杆作用。其次,我们旨在为读者提供访问历史上有效的规范性和道德见解形式,这些形式是由数据司法活动家和倡导者编组的社会转型工具,以便可以将这些形式的规范性和见识形式呈现,而这些形式又可以借鉴建设性的资源来刺激未来的数据正义实践。

The idea of "data justice" is of recent academic vintage. It has arisen over the past decade in Anglo-European research institutions as an attempt to bring together a critique of the power dynamics that underlie accelerating trends of datafication with a normative commitment to the principles of social justice-a commitment to the achievement of a society that is equitable, fair, and capable of confronting the root causes of injustice.However, despite the seeming novelty of such a data justice pedigree, this joining up of the critique of the power imbalances that have shaped the digital and "big data" revolutions with a commitment to social equity and constructive societal transformation has a deeper historical, and more geographically diverse, provenance. As the stories of the data justice initiatives, activism, and advocacy contained in this volume well evidence, practices of data justice across the globe have, in fact, largely preceded the elaboration and crystallisation of the idea of data justice in contemporary academic discourse. In telling these data justice stories, we hope to provide the reader with two interdependent tools of data justice thinking: First, we aim to provide the reader with the critical leverage needed to discern those distortions and malformations of data justice that manifest in subtle and explicit forms of power, domination, and coercion. Second, we aim to provide the reader with access to the historically effective forms of normativity and ethical insight that have been marshalled by data justice activists and advocates as tools of societal transformation-so that these forms of normativity and insight can be drawn on, in turn, as constructive resources to spur future transformative data justice practices.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源