论文标题
工会:系统错误对弱透明峰值计数的影响
UNIONS: The impact of systematic errors on weak-lensing peak counts
论文作者
论文摘要
工会是对北方天空的持续深度光度多波段调查。作为工会的一部分,CFI提供了R波段数据,我们用于研究宇宙学推断的弱透镜峰值计数。我们评估了弱透明峰值计数的系统效应及其对工会调查的宇宙学参数的影响。特别是,我们介绍了局部校准,元素剪切偏差,重型反馈,源银河红移估计,固有比对和簇成员稀释的结果。对于每种不确定性和系统效应,我们描述了我们的缓解方案以及对宇宙参数约束的影响。我们使用CFIS数据和Massivenus n-abody模拟从MCMC获得了对宇宙学参数的限制,作为峰值计数统计的模型。根据校准(本地与全局的校准,以及剩余乘法剪切偏差的包含),平均值密度参数$ω_m$可以转移至$ -0.024 $($-0.5σ$)。我们还看到,相对于仅DM仿真,包括重型校正可以将$ω_m$提高到$+0.027 $($+0.5σ$)。通过信噪比削减固有的对齐和簇成员稀释的影响可能会导致$ω_m$ $+0.027 $($+++0.5σ$)的变化。最后,由于$δ\ bar {z} = 0.03 $的平均红移不确定性,我们看到$ω_m$($+0.001 $)的偏移对应于$+0.02σ$)并不重要。本文首次研究工会弱透明数据和峰值,计算了系统效应的影响。 $ω_m$的值是最大的影响,可以转移到$ \ sim 0.03 $,根据每种系统的选择,对应于$0.5σ$。我们希望限制因未来(较大)数据目录而变得更加可靠,目前的管道将为起点提供一个起点。
UNIONS is an ongoing deep photometric multi-band survey of the Northern sky. As part of UNIONS, CFIS provides r-band data which we use to study weak-lensing peak counts for cosmological inference. We assess systematic effects for weak-lensing peak counts and their impact on cosmological parameters for the UNIONS survey. In particular, we present results on local calibration, metacalibration shear bias, baryonic feedback, the source galaxy redshift estimate, intrinsic alignment, and the cluster member dilution. For each uncertainty and systematic effect, we describe our mitigation scheme and the impact on cosmological parameter constraints. We obtain constraints on cosmological parameters from MCMC using CFIS data and MassiveNuS N-body simulations as a model for peak counts statistics. Depending on the calibration (local versus global, and the inclusion of the residual multiplicative shear bias), the mean matter density parameter $Ω_m$ can shift up to $-0.024$ ($-0.5σ$). We also see that including baryonic corrections can shift $Ω_m$ by $+0.027$ ($+0.5 σ$) with respect to the DM-only simulations. Reducing the impact of the intrinsic alignment and cluster member dilution through signal-to-noise cuts can lead to a shift in $Ω_m$ of $+0.027$ ($+0.5 σ$). Finally, with a mean redshift uncertainty of $Δ\bar{z} = 0.03$, we see that the shift of $Ω_m$ ($+0.001$ which corresponds to $+0.02 σ$) is not significant. This paper investigates for the first time with UNIONS weak-lensing data and peak counts the impact of systematic effects. The value of $Ω_m$ is the most impacted and can shift up to $\sim 0.03$ which corresponds to $0.5σ$ depending on the choices for each systematics. We expect constraints to become more reliable with future (larger) data catalogues, for which the current pipeline will provide a starting point.