论文标题
X射线频率在驱动光蒸发风中的重要性
The importance of X-ray frequency in driving photoevaporative winds
论文作者
论文摘要
光蒸发风是分散原球盘的有前途的机制,但是到目前为止,理论模型一直无法就相对角色达成共识,即X射线,极端紫外线或远紫外线在驱动风中发挥作用。这归因于研究之间的各种方法学差异,包括它们的辐射转移和热平衡方法,所采用的照射光谱的选择以及可用于冷却气体的过程。我们使用\ textsc {mocassin}辐射传输代码来模拟从EUV驱动风的模拟中获取的静态密度网格上的各种光谱的风加热。我们探讨了选择单个代表性X射线频率对它们通过测量最大加热色谱柱作为光子能量的函数来驱动风能的影响。我们证明,为了合理的发光度和光谱,最有效的能量是几美元的$ 100〜 \ Mathrm {ev} $,在X射线频谱的较软区域中牢固地牢固,而具有能量的X射线$ \ sim1000〜 \ Mathrm {ev} $与圆盘相互作用,无法与圆盘相互作用,无法提供充足的热量,以至于无法驱动热量。我们开发了一个简单的模型来解释这些发现。我们认为,在模型上方冷却的进一步增加(例如,由于分子旋转线 - 可能会进一步限制加热到更柔和的能量,但不太可能防止X射线加热风完全发射;增加X射线光度具有相反的效果。因此,应根据辐照光谱的选择来理解光蒸发风模型的各种结果。
Photoevaporative winds are a promising mechanism for dispersing protoplanetary discs, but so far theoretical models have been unable to agree on the relative roles that the X-ray, Extreme Ultraviolet or Far Ultraviolet play in driving the winds. This has been attributed to a variety of methodological differences between studies, including their approach to radiative transfer and thermal balance, the choice of irradiating spectrum employed, and the processes available to cool the gas. We use the \textsc{mocassin} radiative transfer code to simulate wind heating for a variety of spectra on a static density grid taken from simulations of an EUV-driven wind. We explore the impact of choosing a single representative X-ray frequency on their ability to drive a wind by measuring the maximum heated column as a function of photon energy. We demonstrate that for reasonable luminosities and spectra, the most effective energies are at a few $100~\mathrm{eV}$, firmly in the softer regions of the X-ray spectrum, while X-rays with energies $\sim1000~\mathrm{eV}$ interact too weakly with disc gas to provide sufficient heating to drive a wind. We develop a simple model to explain these findings. We argue that further increases in the cooling above our models - for example due to molecular rovibrational lines - may further restrict the heating to the softer energies but are unlikely to prevent X-ray heated winds from launching entirely; increasing the X-ray luminosity has the opposite effect. The various results of photoevaporative wind models should therefore be understood in terms of the choice of irradiating spectrum.