论文标题

点云的表面重建:调查和基准测试

Surface Reconstruction from Point Clouds: A Survey and a Benchmark

论文作者

Huang, Zhangjin, Wen, Yuxin, Wang, Zihao, Ren, Jinjuan, Jia, Kui

论文摘要

从其原始的离散点云观察中重建二维流形的连续表面是一个长期存在的问题。这个问题在技术上是不适的,并且考虑到通过实用深度扫描获得的点云中出现各种感应缺陷,因此变得更加困难。在文献中,已经提出了丰富的方法,还提供了现有方法的综述。但是,现有的评论缺乏对共同基准测试的彻底调查。本文旨在在深度学习表面重建的新时代审查和基准测试现有方法。为此,我们贡献了一个大规模的基准数据集,该数据集由合成数据和实际扫描数据组成。基准测试包括对象和场景级的表面,并考虑到通常在实用深度扫描中遇到的各种感应缺陷。我们通过比较有关构建基准的现有方法进行彻底的实证研究,并特别注意现有方法的鲁棒性,以与各种扫描缺陷有关。我们还研究了不同的方法如何在重建复杂的表面形状方面概括。我们的研究有助于确定不同方法起作用的最佳条件,并提出一些经验发现。例如,尽管深度学习方法越来越流行,但我们的系统研究表明,令人惊讶的是,在鲁棒性和概括方面,一些经典方法的表现更好。我们的研究还表明,从多视图扫描,缺失地面点和点离群值的点集合的实际挑战均未被所有现有的表面重建方法所避免。我们预计,基准和我们的研究对于从业人员和未来研究的新创新都会很有价值。

Reconstruction of a continuous surface of two-dimensional manifold from its raw, discrete point cloud observation is a long-standing problem. The problem is technically ill-posed, and becomes more difficult considering that various sensing imperfections would appear in the point clouds obtained by practical depth scanning. In literature, a rich set of methods has been proposed, and reviews of existing methods are also provided. However, existing reviews are short of thorough investigations on a common benchmark. The present paper aims to review and benchmark existing methods in the new era of deep learning surface reconstruction. To this end, we contribute a large-scale benchmarking dataset consisting of both synthetic and real-scanned data; the benchmark includes object- and scene-level surfaces and takes into account various sensing imperfections that are commonly encountered in practical depth scanning. We conduct thorough empirical studies by comparing existing methods on the constructed benchmark, and pay special attention on robustness of existing methods against various scanning imperfections; we also study how different methods generalize in terms of reconstructing complex surface shapes. Our studies help identify the best conditions under which different methods work, and suggest some empirical findings. For example, while deep learning methods are increasingly popular, our systematic studies suggest that, surprisingly, a few classical methods perform even better in terms of both robustness and generalization; our studies also suggest that the practical challenges of misalignment of point sets from multi-view scanning, missing of surface points, and point outliers remain unsolved by all the existing surface reconstruction methods. We expect that the benchmark and our studies would be valuable both for practitioners and as a guidance for new innovations in future research.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源