论文标题

全参考的无校准图像质量评估

Full-Reference Calibration-Free Image Quality Assessment

论文作者

Di Claudio, Elio D., Giannitrapani, Paolo, Jacovitti, Giovanni

论文摘要

客观图像质量评估(IQA)方法的一个主要问题是,就人类受试者表达的分数缺乏线性质量估计。因此,通常IQA指标会基于主观质量示例进行校准过程。但是,基于示例的培训使概括性化,妨碍了不同应用和手术条件的结果比较。在本文中,引入了新的完整参考技术(FR)技术,提供与不使用校准的人类得分线性相关的估计值。为了实现这一目标,这些技术深深植根于原理和理论约束。限制了一组自然图像的IQA的兴趣,首先认识到,估计理论和心理物理原理的应用在高斯模糊降低的图像中的应用导致了所谓的规范IQA方法,其估计值不仅与主观得分高度线性地相关,而且与观察距离(VD)也直接相关(VD)。然后,显示出主流IQA方法可以通过基于唯一标本图像的初步度量转换进行重新连接到规范方法。然后将该方案的应用扩展到高斯模糊以外的重要一类退化图像,包括嘈杂和压缩图像。所得的无校准FR IQA方法适用于不同成像系统和不同VDS的可比性和互操作性的应用。最终提供了对某些常规校准方法的统计性能的比较。

One major problem of objective Image Quality Assessment (IQA) methods is the lack of linearity of their quality estimates with respect to scores expressed by human subjects. For this reason, usually IQA metrics undergo a calibration process based on subjective quality examples. However, example-based training makes generalization problematic, hampering result comparison across different applications and operative conditions. In this paper, new Full Reference (FR) techniques, providing estimates linearly correlated with human scores without using calibration are introduced. To reach this objective, these techniques are deeply rooted on principles and theoretical constraints. Restricting the interest on the IQA of the set of natural images, it is first recognized that application of estimation theory and psycho physical principles to images degraded by Gaussian blur leads to a so-called canonical IQA method, whose estimates are not only highly linearly correlated to subjective scores, but are also straightforwardly related to the Viewing Distance (VD). Then, it is shown that mainstream IQA methods can be reconducted to the canonical method applying a preliminary metric conversion based on a unique specimen image. The application of this scheme is then extended to a significant class of degraded images other than Gaussian blur, including noisy and compressed images. The resulting calibration-free FR IQA methods are suited for applications where comparability and interoperability across different imaging systems and on different VDs is a major requirement. A comparison of their statistical performance with respect to some conventional calibration prone methods is finally provided.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源