论文标题
深度美学评估和乳腺癌治疗结果的检索
Deep Aesthetic Assessment and Retrieval of Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes
论文作者
论文摘要
近年来,乳腺癌的治疗持续发展和改善,导致存活率大幅提高,大约80 \%的患者患有10年的生存期。鉴于乳腺癌治疗可以对患者的身体形象产生的严重影响,从而影响她的自信心以及性和亲密关系,因此确保妇女获得优化生存和美学结果的治疗是至关重要的。目前,没有用于评估乳腺癌治疗的美学结果的黄金标准。此外,没有标准方法可以向患者展示手术的潜在结果。对过去的妇女对可能的结果的期望,对过去的类似案件的介绍将非常重要。在这项工作中,我们提出了一个深层神经网络来执行美学评估。作为概念验证,我们专注于二进制美学评估。除了用于分类外,该深度神经网络还可以通过在分类前在高度语义空间中搜索最近的邻居来找到过去的情况。我们在保守治疗乳腺癌后的143张女性照片的数据集上进行了实验。准确性和平衡准确性的结果表明,与乳腺癌治疗的美学评估相比,我们提出的模型的表现优异。此外,该模型显示出良好的检索类似先前情况的能力,而检索的情况具有相同或相邻的类别(在4级设置)并具有相似类型的不对称性。最后,还进行了定性的可解释性评估,以分析模型的鲁棒性和可信度。
Treatments for breast cancer have continued to evolve and improve in recent years, resulting in a substantial increase in survival rates, with approximately 80\% of patients having a 10-year survival period. Given the serious impact that breast cancer treatments can have on a patient's body image, consequently affecting her self-confidence and sexual and intimate relationships, it is paramount to ensure that women receive the treatment that optimizes both survival and aesthetic outcomes. Currently, there is no gold standard for evaluating the aesthetic outcome of breast cancer treatment. In addition, there is no standard way to show patients the potential outcome of surgery. The presentation of similar cases from the past would be extremely important to manage women's expectations of the possible outcome. In this work, we propose a deep neural network to perform the aesthetic evaluation. As a proof-of-concept, we focus on a binary aesthetic evaluation. Besides its use for classification, this deep neural network can also be used to find the most similar past cases by searching for nearest neighbours in the highly semantic space before classification. We performed the experiments on a dataset consisting of 143 photos of women after conservative treatment for breast cancer. The results for accuracy and balanced accuracy showed the superior performance of our proposed model compared to the state of the art in aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer treatments. In addition, the model showed a good ability to retrieve similar previous cases, with the retrieved cases having the same or adjacent class (in the 4-class setting) and having similar types of asymmetry. Finally, a qualitative interpretability assessment was also performed to analyse the robustness and trustworthiness of the model.