论文标题
许多最近的密度功能在数字上是行为不良的
Many recent density functionals are numerically ill-behaved
论文作者
论文摘要
化学和材料科学领域的大多数计算研究都是基于密度功能理论的使用。尽管确切的密度函数尚不清楚,但几个密度函数近似(DFAS)为应用的计算成本和半定量精度提供了良好的平衡。 DFA的发展仍在许多方面继续进行,每年都会发布一些新的DFA,以提高准确性。但是,这些DFA的数值行为通常是一个被忽略的问题。在这项工作中,我们介绍了LIBXC 5.2.2中可用的三维系统的所有592 DFA,并根据成符号的原子Hartree-fock波函数检查密度功能总能量的收敛性。我们表明,最近的几个DFA,包括著名的扫描功能家族,表现出与通常使用的数值正交方案的不切实际的趋势,使这些功能都不适合常规应用或高精度研究,因为成千上万的径向正交点可能需要取得这些范围,以实现这些范围的准确率,而这些功能是sub-$ $ $ $ $ $ e { SG-3网格仅包含$ \ MATHCAL {O}(100)$ radial正交点。这些结果都警告用户在采用新型功能时检查正交网格的充分性,也是对理论社区的指南,以开发出更好的行为密度功能。
Most computational studies in chemistry and materials science are based on the use of density functional theory. Although the exact density functional is unknown, several density functional approximations (DFAs) offer a good balance of affordable computational cost and semi-quantitative accuracy for applications. The development of DFAs still continues on many fronts, and several new DFAs aiming for improved accuracy are published every year. However, the numerical behavior of these DFAs is an often overlooked problem. In this work, we look at all 592 DFAs for three-dimensional systems available in Libxc 5.2.2 and examine the convergence of the density functional total energy based on tabulated atomic Hartree-Fock wave functions. We show that several recent DFAs, including the celebrated SCAN family of functionals, show impractically slow convergence with typically used numerical quadrature schemes, making these functionals unsuitable both for routine applications or high-precision studies, as thousands of radial quadrature points may be required to achieve sub-$μE_{h}$ accurate total energies for these unctionals, while standard quadrature grids like the SG-3 grid only contain $\mathcal{O}(100)$ radial quadrature points. These results are both a warning to users to lways check the sufficiency of the quadrature grid when adopting novel functionals, as well as a guideline to the theory community to develop better behaved density functionals.