论文标题
AI伦理:一项关于从业者和立法者的观点的实证研究
AI Ethics: An Empirical Study on the Views of Practitioners and Lawmakers
论文作者
论文摘要
在智能系统环境中,人工智能(AI)解决方案和技术正在越来越多地采用,但是,这些技术不断关注道德不确定性。各种指南,原则和监管框架旨在确保AI技术带来道德福祉。但是,AI伦理原则和准则的含义仍在辩论中。为了进一步探讨AI道德原则和相关挑战的重要性,我们对来自五十个国家的20个国家的99名代表AI从业人员和立法者(例如AI工程师,律师)进行了调查。据我们所知,这是首次涵盖两种不同类型的人群(AI从业者和立法者)的看法的第一项实证研究,研究结果证实,透明度,问责制和隐私是最关键的AI伦理原则。另一方面,缺乏道德知识,没有法律框架和缺乏监控机构是最常见的AI伦理挑战。对AI道德原则挑战的影响分析表明,实践中的冲突是一个高度严格的挑战。此外,从业者和立法者的看法在统计上与特定原则(例如公平,自由)和挑战(例如缺乏监控机构,机器失真)的显着差异相关。我们的发现刺激了进一步的研究,尤其是赋予现有能力成熟度模型的能力,以支持伦理意识的AI系统的发展和质量评估。
Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions and technologies are being increasingly adopted in smart systems context, however, such technologies are continuously concerned with ethical uncertainties. Various guidelines, principles, and regulatory frameworks are designed to ensure that AI technologies bring ethical well-being. However, the implications of AI ethics principles and guidelines are still being debated. To further explore the significance of AI ethics principles and relevant challenges, we conducted a survey of 99 representative AI practitioners and lawmakers (e.g., AI engineers, lawyers) from twenty countries across five continents. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first empirical study that encapsulates the perceptions of two different types of population (AI practitioners and lawmakers) and the study findings confirm that transparency, accountability, and privacy are the most critical AI ethics principles. On the other hand, lack of ethical knowledge, no legal frameworks, and lacking monitoring bodies are found the most common AI ethics challenges. The impact analysis of the challenges across AI ethics principles reveals that conflict in practice is a highly severe challenge. Moreover, the perceptions of practitioners and lawmakers are statistically correlated with significant differences for particular principles (e.g. fairness, freedom) and challenges (e.g. lacking monitoring bodies, machine distortion). Our findings stimulate further research, especially empowering existing capability maturity models to support the development and quality assessment of ethics-aware AI systems.