论文标题
回复“评论“对高温高温库层超导体薄膜中的顶氧空位引起的各向异性散射””””
Reply to "Comment on 'Anisotropic Scattering Caused by Apical Oxygen Vacancies in Thin Films of Overdoped High Temperature Cuprate Superconductors'"
论文作者
论文摘要
在我们最近的工作中[物理学。莱特牧师。 128，137001（2002）]，我们提出，根尖氧空位起着各向异性散射杂质。在天生的近似值中，这导致了抗邻苯二甲酸（节点）方向上最大（零）的准粒子散射速率。这种独特的角度依赖性提供了一种直接的机制，可以使一些令人困惑的实验结果$ _ $ _ {2-x} $ sr $ _x $ _x $ cuo $ _4 $ _4 $（LSCO）胶片，涉及超级流体密度$ρ_S$和光学电导率$σ_1$。在H. Ozdemir等人最近的评论中。 [arxiv：2206.01301]，重新强调了杂质散射性质的重要性，但提出了一些挑战，但提出了一些挑战。散射。这些问题很有趣，但无关紧要或进一步增强了我们的结论。我们在此答复中逐一讨论这些观点。
In our recent work [Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 137001 (2002)], we proposed that the apical oxygen vacancies act as anisotropic scattering impurities. Within the Born approximation, this leads to a quasi-particle scattering rate that is maximal (zero) in the antinodal (nodal) direction. This unique angular dependence provides a straightforward mechanism for some puzzling experimental results in overdoped La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ (LSCO) films regarding the superfluid density $ρ_s$ and optical conductivity $σ_1$. In a recent comment by H. U. Ozdemir et al. [arXiv:2206.01301], the importance of the nature of the impurity scattering is re-emphasized, but some challenges to our picture are raised: that we did not consider the change of the electrostatic potential for in-plane electrons once the apical oxygen is missing, the change of Fermi surface topology as the van Hove point is passed, self-energy corrections caused by d-wave pairing, and vertex corrections caused by forward scattering. These concerns are interesting but are either irrelevant or further enhances our conclusions. We discuss these points one by one in this reply.
