论文标题
是否有证据表明量子化学中的指数量子优势?
Is there evidence for exponential quantum advantage in quantum chemistry?
论文作者
论文摘要
使用量子机械设备模拟其他量子系统的想法通常归因于Feynman。由于最初的建议,因此出现了通过量子计算来模拟分子和材料化学的混凝土建议,作为潜在的``杀手应用''。人工任务中潜在的指数量子优势的迹象增加了对此应用的兴趣,因此,了解量子化学中潜在的指数量子优势的基础至关重要。在这里,我们在量子化学中最常见的任务中收集了这一病例的证据,即地基能量估计。我们得出的结论是,在化学空间之间存在这种指数优势的证据尚未找到。虽然量子计算机可能仍然被证明对量子化学有用,但假设指数加速不适合此问题,可能是谨慎的。
The idea to use quantum mechanical devices to simulate other quantum systems is commonly ascribed to Feynman. Since the original suggestion, concrete proposals have appeared for simulating molecular and materials chemistry through quantum computation, as a potential ``killer application''. Indications of potential exponential quantum advantage in artificial tasks have increased interest in this application, thus, it is critical to understand the basis for potential exponential quantum advantage in quantum chemistry. Here we gather the evidence for this case in the most common task in quantum chemistry, namely, ground-state energy estimation. We conclude that evidence for such an exponential advantage across chemical space has yet to be found. While quantum computers may still prove useful for quantum chemistry, it may be prudent to assume exponential speedups are not generically available for this problem.