论文标题

衡量友谊亲密关系:社会认同理论的观点

Measuring Friendship Closeness: A Perspective of Social Identity Theory

论文作者

Zhang, Shiqi, Sun, Jiachen, Lin, Wenqing, Xiao, Xiaokui, Tang, Bo

论文摘要

衡量友谊的亲密关系是一个重要的问题,可以在实践中找到许多应用。例如,在线游戏平台通常举办友谊增强事件,其中用户(称为来源)仅邀请他/她的朋友(称为目标)一起玩。在这种情况下,友谊亲密关系的度量是理解源邀请和目标采用行为的骨干,并为来源的有希望目标提供了建议。但是,大多数现有的友谊亲密关系措施只考虑来源和目标之间的信息,但忽略了他们所在的群体的信息,这会导致结果较低。为了解决这个问题,我们根据社会身份理论(SIT)提出了针对友谊亲密关系的新措施,该措施描述了目标认可同一组中用户的行为的倾向。 SIT的核心是目标评估用户或我们的用户组的过程。不幸的是,由于感知因素,难以捕获此过程。为此,我们无缝地将SIT的因素置于定量措施中,这些措施考虑了目标群体的本地和全球信息。我们进行了广泛的实验,以评估提案对3个在线游戏数据集的8种最先进方法的有效性。特别是,我们证明我们的解决方案可以在相应的评估度量中胜过行为预测(分别在线目标建议)的最佳竞争者(分别在线目标建议)高达23.2%(分别为34.2%)。

Measuring the closeness of friendships is an important problem that finds numerous applications in practice. For example, online gaming platforms often host friendship-enhancing events in which a user (called the source) only invites his/her friend (called the target) to play together. In this scenario, the measure of friendship closeness is the backbone for understanding source invitation and target adoption behaviors, and underpins the recommendation of promising targets for the sources. However, most existing measures for friendship closeness only consider the information between the source and target but ignore the information of groups where they are located, which renders inferior results. To address this issue, we present new measures for friendship closeness based on the social identity theory (SIT), which describes the inclination that a target endorses behaviors of users inside the same group. The core of SIT is the process that a target assesses groups of users as them or us. Unfortunately, this process is difficult to be captured due to perceptual factors. To this end, we seamlessly reify the factors of SIT into quantitative measures, which consider local and global information of a target's group. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of our proposal against 8 state-of-the-art methods on 3 online gaming datasets. In particular, we demonstrate that our solution can outperform the best competitor on the behavior prediction (resp. online target recommendation) by up to 23.2% (resp. 34.2%) in the corresponding evaluation metric.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源