论文标题
政府使用人工智能和自动决策的信任框架
A Trust Framework for Government Use of Artificial Intelligence and Automated Decision Making
论文作者
论文摘要
本文确定了公共部门系统和流程的机械化,数字化和自动化的当前挑战,并提出了一个现代且实用的框架,以确保和确保公共机构中的道德和高果实人工智能(AI)或自动化的决策(ADM)系统。该框架是为澳大利亚管辖权和宪法背景的公共部门的特定背景而设计的,但可扩展到其他司法管辖区和私营部门。该框架的目标是:1)赢得公众信任并增强公众对政府系统的信心; 2)确保有效履行行政法公共机构的独特责任和责任(包括公众); 3)确保通过采用这种系统产生积极的人类,社会和道德影响。该框架可以扩展以确保积极的环境或其他影响,但本文着重于人类/社会成果和公众信任。本文旨在补充基于原则的框架,例如澳大利亚的人工智能伦理框架和值得信赖的AI的欧盟评估列表。在许多国家 /地区,库维德创造了一个改善信任的泡沫,一种泡沫,可以说已经弹出,并且在一个前所未有的公共机构不信任的时代(但即使在高信任的时期),服务速度更快或更具成本效益是不够的。本文提出了有关政府系统(技术平台,运营,文化,治理,参与等)的建议,这将有助于提高公共信心和对公共机构,政策和服务的信任,同时履行公共部门的特殊义务和责任。
This paper identifies the current challenges of the mechanisation, digitisation and automation of public sector systems and processes, and proposes a modern and practical framework to ensure and assure ethical and high veracity Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Automated Decision Making (ADM) systems in public institutions. This framework is designed for the specific context of the public sector, in the jurisdictional and constitutional context of Australia, but is extendable to other jurisdictions and private sectors. The goals of the framework are to: 1) earn public trust and grow public confidence in government systems; 2) to ensure the unique responsibilities and accountabilities (including to the public) of public institutions under Administrative Law are met effectively; and 3) to assure a positive human, societal and ethical impact from the adoption of such systems. The framework could be extended to assure positive environmental or other impacts, but this paper focuses on human/societal outcomes and public trust. This paper is meant to complement principles-based frameworks like Australia's Artificial Intelligence Ethics Framework and the EU Assessment List for Trustworthy AI. In many countries, COVID created a bubble of improved trust, a bubble which has arguably already popped, and in an era of unprecedented mistrust of public institutions (but even in times of high trust) it is not enough that a service is faster, or more cost-effective. This paper proposes recommendations for government systems (technology platforms, operations, culture, governance, engagement, etc.) that would help to improve public confidence and trust in public institutions, policies and services, whilst meeting the special obligations and responsibilities of the public sector.