论文标题
在英国建造政策制定国家卫生指数的评估和发展
Assessments and developments in constructing a National Health Index for policy making, in the United Kingdom
论文作者
论文摘要
综合指标是总结,测量和比较不同社区之间变化的有用工具。英国国家统计局的一年一度的英格兰卫生指数(从2015年开始)由三个主要健康领域(生命,地点和人员)组成,以监控健康措施,随着时间的流逝和各个不同地理位置(149个上层级别的机构,9个地区和一个全国性的国家指数),并评估国家健康。复合指标定义为子域内,域内子域以及整体索引内的域内指标的加权平均值(线性组合)。该健康指数的目的是随着时间的流逝,地理位置协调,并作为政策实施和评估的工具。我们评估了施工中采取的步骤,回顾了2015 - 2018年健康指数数据的概念相干性和统计要求。为了评估这些内容,我们重点介绍了三个主要步骤:不同指数级别的相关分析;从因子分析得出的实施权重与主要组件分析和优化系统权重的两个替代权重的比较;敏感性和不确定性分析以评估排名在多大程度上取决于选定的方法论选择。根据结果,我们强调了功能,这些功能改善了即将到来的英国健康指数的统计要求。
Composite indicators are a useful tool to summarize, measure and compare changes among different communities. The UK Office for National Statistics has created an annual England Health Index (starting from 2015) comprised of three main health domains - lives, places and people - to monitor health measures, over time and across different geographical areas (149 Upper Tier Level Authorities, 9 regions and an overall national index) and to evaluate the health of the nation. The composite indicator is defined as a weighted average (linear combination) of indicators within subdomains, subdomains within domains, and domains within the overall index. The Health Index was designed to be comparable over time, geographically harmonized and to serve as a tool for policy implementation and assessment. We evaluated the steps taken in the construction, reviewing the conceptual coherence and statistical requirements on Health Index data for 2015-2018. To assess these, we have focused on three main steps: correlation analysis at different index levels; comparison of the implemented weights derived from factor analysis with two alternative weights from principal components analysis and optimized system weights; a sensitivity and uncertainty analysis to assess to what extent rankings depend on the selected set of methodological choices. Based on the results, we have highlighted features that have improved statistical requirements of the forthcoming UK Health Index.