学术文献库

Augmenting the control arm of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with external data may increase power at the risk of introducing bias. Existing data fusion estimators generally rely on stringent assumptions or may have decreased coverage or power in the presence of bias. Framing the problem as one of data-adaptive experiment selection, potential experiments include the RCT only or the RCT combined with different candidate real-world datasets. To select and analyze the experiment with the optimal bias-variance tradeoff, we develop a novel experiment-selector cross-validated targeted maximum likelihood estimator (ES-CVTMLE). The ES-CVTMLE uses two bias estimates: 1) a function of the difference in conditional mean outcome under control between the RCT and combined experiments and 2) an estimate of the average treatment effect on a negative control outcome (NCO). We define the asymptotic distribution of the ES-CVTMLE under varying magnitudes of bias and construct confidence intervals by Monte Carlo simulation. In simulations involving violations of identification assumptions, the ES-CVTMLE had better coverage than test-then-pool approaches and an NCO-based bias adjustment approach and higher power than one implementation of a Bayesian dynamic borrowing approach. We further demonstrate the ability of the ES-CVTMLE to distinguish biased from unbiased external controls through a re-analysis of the effect of liraglutide on glycemic control from the LEADER trial. The ES-CVTMLE has the potential to improve power while providing relatively robust inference for future hybrid RCT-RWD studies.