论文标题

OpenOOD:基准对广义分布检测进行基准测试

OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection

论文作者

Yang, Jingkang, Wang, Pengyun, Zou, Dejian, Zhou, Zitang, Ding, Kunyuan, Peng, Wenxuan, Wang, Haoqi, Chen, Guangyao, Li, Bo, Sun, Yiyou, Du, Xuefeng, Zhou, Kaiyang, Zhang, Wayne, Hendrycks, Dan, Li, Yixuan, Liu, Ziwei

论文摘要

分布(OOD)检测对于安全至关重要的机器学习应用至关重要,因此已经对文献中开发了大量方法进行了广泛的研究。但是,该领域目前缺乏统一,严格配制和全面的基准,这通常会导致不公平的比较和不确定的结果。从问题设置的角度来看,OOD检测与相邻的字段密切相关,包括异常检测(AD),开放集识别(OSR)和模型不确定性,因为为一个域开发的方法通常相互适用。为了帮助社区改善评估和进步,我们构建了一个统一的,结构良好的代码库,称为OpenOOD,该代码库在相关领域中开发的30种方法,并根据最近提出的广义OOD检测框架提供了全面的基准。通过对这些方法进行全面比较,我们感到满意的是,在过去的几年中,该领域在过去的几年中已经取得了显着发展,在这种情况下,预处理方法和正交后事后方法都表现出强大的潜力。

Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is vital to safety-critical machine learning applications and has thus been extensively studied, with a plethora of methods developed in the literature. However, the field currently lacks a unified, strictly formulated, and comprehensive benchmark, which often results in unfair comparisons and inconclusive results. From the problem setting perspective, OOD detection is closely related to neighboring fields including anomaly detection (AD), open set recognition (OSR), and model uncertainty, since methods developed for one domain are often applicable to each other. To help the community to improve the evaluation and advance, we build a unified, well-structured codebase called OpenOOD, which implements over 30 methods developed in relevant fields and provides a comprehensive benchmark under the recently proposed generalized OOD detection framework. With a comprehensive comparison of these methods, we are gratified that the field has progressed significantly over the past few years, where both preprocessing methods and the orthogonal post-hoc methods show strong potential.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源