论文标题
部分可观测时空混沌系统的无模型预测
GRB 221009A: A light dark matter burst or an extremely bright Inverse Compton component?
论文作者
论文摘要
由于释放的大量能量以及JET中涉及的强磁场,伽马射线爆发(GRB)被认为是潜在的非常高的光子发射器。但是,由于它们对$ z \ gtrsim 0.1 $的爆发,由于它们对外层次背景光(EBL)的衰减,因此不会从$ z \ gtrsim 0.1 $的爆发中检测到TEV光子。由于这些原因,最近对来自GRB 221009a(Z = 0.151)的18和251 TEV的光子去年10月9日观察到了2022年10月9日,这对我们对TEV发射机制的了解和外层次背景提出了质疑。为了解释TEV观察,最近探索暗物质候选人的著作开始出现。在本文中,我们讨论了最合理的情况下的所需条件和局限性,即GRB余辉中的Synchrotron-Seft Compton(SSC)辐射,以解释EBL以外的18个TEV光子观察。为了避免klein-nishina效应,我们发现Circumburst中值$> 1 {\ rm cm^{ - 3}} $的微物理磁参数的不可能值低于$ 10^{ - 6} $(预期在Collapsar Scenario中预期)。因此,我们从阿尔卑斯山和暗光子机制方面探讨了可能的情况,以解释这种高能的光子,并讨论了GRB能量学的含义。我们发现阿尔卑斯山和深色光子方案可以解释18个TEV光子,而不能解释251 TEV光子。
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been considered as potential very high-energy photon emitters due to the large amount of energy released as well as the strong magnetic fields involved in their jets. However, the detection of TeV photons is not expected from bursts beyond a redshift of $z\gtrsim 0.1$ due to their attenuation with the extragalactic background light (EBL). For these reasons, the recent observation of photons with energies of 18 and 251 TeV from GRB 221009A (z=0.151) last October 9th, 2022 has challenged what we know about the TeV-emission mechanisms and the extragalactic background. In order to explain the TeV observations, recent works exploring candidates of dark matter have started to appear. In this paper, we discuss the required conditions and limitations within the most plausible scenario, synchrotron-self Compton (SSC) radiation in the GRB afterglow, to interpret the one 18-TeV photon observation besides the EBL. To avoid the Klein-Nishina effect, we find an improbable value of the microphysical magnetic parameter below $10^{-6}$ for a circumburst medium value $> 1{\rm cm^{-3}}$ (expected in the collapsar scenario). Therefore, we explore possible scenarios in terms of ALPs and dark photon mechanisms to interpret this highly-energetic photon and we discuss the implications in the GRB energetics. We find that the ALPs and dark photon scenarios can explain the 18 TeV photon but not the 251 TeV photon.