论文标题
我与约翰·斯图尔特·贝尔（John Stewart Bell）对量子基础的讨论
My discussions of quantum foundations with John Stewart Bell
论文作者
论文摘要
1976年，我在CERN遇到了约翰·贝尔（John Bell），我们谈到了可能违反光学定理，纯度测试，EPR悖论，贝尔的不平等及其违规行为。我回顾了我们的讨论，并解释了它们与我较早的研究有何关系。我还复制了手写笔记，这是在我们的第一次会议上给贝尔给贝尔的笔记，并在1982年给我发了一封手写的信。我们再也见不到了我，但是我继续讨论Bi-Chsh的不平等现象及其在几篇论文中的违法行为。贝尔论文和实验进行检查以检查其不平等的研究导致量子纠缠在量子信息和量子技术中的几个重要应用。不幸的是，这也导致了关于量子非局部性和复古造成的非凡形而上学主张和猜测，在我们看来，约翰·贝尔今天不认可。 Bi-Chsh的不平等现象在物理学和认知科学中受到了侵犯，但既证明量子力学的完整性也不是其非局部性。量子计算优势并不是由于遥远物理系统之间的某些神奇的瞬时影响。因此，必须谨慎地得出贝尔不平等的深远哲学结论。
In 1976, I met John Bell several times in CERN and we talked about a possible violation of optical theorem, purity tests, EPR paradox, Bell inequalities and their violation. I review our discussions, and explain how they were related to my earlier research. I also reproduce handwritten notes, which I gave to Bell during our first meeting and a handwritten letter he sent to me in 1982. We have never met again, but I have continued to discuss BI-CHSH inequalities and their violation in several papers. The research stimulated by Bell papers and experiments performed to check his inequalities led to several important applications of quantum entanglement in quantum information and quantum technologies. Unfortunately, it led also to extraordinary metaphysical claims and speculations about quantum nonlocality and retro-causality, which in our opinion John Bell would not endorse today. BI-CHSH inequalities are violated in physics and in cognitive science, but it neither proved the completeness of quantum mechanics nor its nonlocality. Quantum computing advantage is not due to some magical instantaneous influences between distant physical systems. Therefore one has to be cautious in drawing far-reaching philosophical conclusions from Bell inequalities.
